Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A blog to refute Modern Evangelicalism for lies like these: 1. Get saved by praying a prayer when YOU want. 2. Doctrine is bad. 3. Jesus is nice. 4. Disagreeing is bad, wimping out is good. 5. God hates no one. 6. Nice equals true. 7. Anger at sin is sin and we hate it. 8. Don't say "hell", if not cussing. 9. Live in sin and be saved. 10. God wants me happy. 11. Be positive. 12. God is "love". 13. If people like me, I'm right. 14. Don't study; have "devotions". 15. Don't judge.
BURN THE SEMINARY TO SAVE THE CHURCH? ...PERHAPS
In today's church a man can spend $100,000 going to Bible school and seminary for just tuition alone. Then add living expenses for 4 to 7 years without a real income.
Why?
Why are we sending young men and women thousands of miles from their home churches and into decades of debt?
Is someone serving themselves instead of God? How much did Paul charge Timothy to train him for the ministry? Why has the biblical model been replaced by a super-expensive, non-biblical bucket of nonsense like the Bible-school-and-seminary system. Is there another way to get biblical training without this sort of compromise?
I think so. And I'll prove it. A series called "Burn the Seminary" will follow the current series on The Lost Doctrine of Holiness.
Now find all the classes you want in Hebrew, Greek, hermeneutics, philosophy, theology, and apologetics. So go to the JTBA website and find out how to register.
3 comments:
That is a good quote. Who would have thought that your view of the gospel was so closely related to your hermeneutic. Your hermeneutic doesn't allow you to engage a text, but rather subvert it.
REB,
How are you? Long time no hear.
God bless,
Phil Perkins.
Anon.,
I see you're still mad. Can you document that my hermeneutics are substantively different from other scholars who subscribe to the inerrancy of Scripture? Or can you point out the aspects of my hermeneutics that are different from any course in literature interpretation, other than one taught by a deconstructionist? You won't be able to show that. I taught hermeneutics at the college level.
You can make all the accusations you wish, but document or explain logically why they are true. That's in the rules here.
Also, you need to use your real name or I'll cut you off again. You ought to be brave enough to stand behind your claims personally. Why the anonymity in a forum where the worst that can happen is to have someone disagree with you? That's awfully cowardly, isn't it? So if your next comment never appears, you either didn't use your real name or you didn't defend a point you made with documentation or logic.
Phil Perkins.
Post a Comment